“New people” in Nikolai Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?”
3.2
(6)
“New people” in Nikolai Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” Chernyshevsky’s novel “What to do?” is a work of art, represents a “mental experiment” of the author, who seeks to understand the possible development of those situations, conflicts, types of personalities and principles of their behavior that have already developed in modern life. Chernyshevsky sees the task of his work as showing how positive ideals, far from the reality of dreams, gradually move into the sphere of real, practical activity, accessible to ordinary people, people of a new type. After all, the novel itself is not just called “What is to be done?”, but has a special subtitle: “Stories about new people.” New people become, according to Chernyshevsky, a phenomenon of everyday life. Now ideals are moving from the sphere of dreams to the sphere of practical life, and life accessible to ordinary people. Therefore, the author himself bases the plot of the novel on the example of the life of an ordinary woman. New people are significantly different from the nihilist Bazarov. The main character of “Fathers and Sons” considered his main task to be “clearing the place.” Chernyshevsky, against the backdrop of the controversy developing around Turgenev’s novel, poses a qualitatively new task: to show that new people build, and not just destroy, i.e. show not the destructive, but the creative role of new people. The theory of rational egoism, or the theory of calculation of benefits, proclaimed and put into practice by new people, is also essentially new. Chernyshevsky does not question the rationality of a person, saying that a person can fully rationally calculate his egoistic path to happiness. Calculating one's own benefit, according to the author of the novel, also involves a certain respectful attitude towards other people: “In order for people to enjoy the happiness of love, they must be surrounded by equally happy people.” Thus, the theory of rational egoism is manifested by the theory of revolutionary altruism. An example of reasonable egoism is the reasoning of Lopukhov, who foresaw the need for himself to “leave the stage” when he saw that Vera Pavlovna and Kirsanov loved each other: “It’s unpleasant for me to lose a friend; and then - it’s time for me to go underground.” Lopukhov's actions show that the moral level of new people is very high. And Vera Pavlovna herself calms down only when Lopukhov becomes completely happy. By creating images of “ordinary new people” in his work, Chernyshevsky shows that personal freedom does not mean a reduction in moral requirements for oneself and the people around him, but, on the contrary, gives a person the opportunity to reveal his mental and creative potential most fully and brightly.
3.2 / 5. 6
.
Essay New people in “What to do?”
What distinguishes “new people” from “vulgar” ones, such as Marya Aleksevna? A new understanding of human “benefit”, natural, unperverted, corresponding to human nature. For Marya Aleksevna, it is beneficial that she satisfies her narrow, “unreasonable” petty-bourgeois egoism. New people see their “benefit” in something else: in the social significance of their work, in the pleasure of doing good to others, in bringing benefit to others - in “reasonable egoism.” The morality of the new people is revolutionary in its deep, inner essence; it completely denies and destroys the officially recognized morality, on the foundations of which Chernyshevsky’s contemporary society rests - the morality of sacrifice and duty. Lopukhov says that “the victim is soft-boiled boots.” All actions, all deeds of a person are only truly viable when they are performed not under compulsion, but according to internal attraction, when they are consistent with desires and beliefs. Everything that is done in society under duress, under the pressure of duty, ultimately turns out to be inferior and stillborn. Such, for example, is the noble reform “from above” - the “sacrifice” brought by the upper class to the people. The morality of new people frees up the creative possibilities of the human personality, joyfully realizing the true needs of human nature, based, according to Chernyshevsky, on the “instinct of social solidarity.” In accordance with this instinct, Lopukhov enjoys doing science, and Vera Pavlovna enjoys working with people and running sewing workshops on reasonable and fair socialist principles. New people are solving love problems and problems of family relationships that are fatal to humanity in a new way. Chernyshevsky is convinced that the main source of intimate dramas is inequality between men and women, a woman’s dependence on a man. Emancipation, Chernyshevsky hopes, will significantly change the very nature of love. A woman’s excessive concentration on love feelings will disappear. Her participation on an equal basis with a man in public affairs will remove drama in love relationships, and at the same time destroy the feeling of jealousy as purely selfish in nature. New people resolve the most dramatic conflict in human relationships, the love triangle, differently, less painfully. Pushkin’s “how God grant your beloved one to be different” becomes for them not an exception, but an everyday norm of life. Lopukhov, having learned about Vera Pavlovna’s love for Kirsanov, voluntarily gives way to his friend, leaving the stage. Moreover, on Lopukhov’s part this is not a sacrifice - but “the most profitable benefit.” Ultimately, having made a “calculation of benefits,” he experiences a joyful feeling of satisfaction from an act that brings happiness not only to Kirsanov and Vera Pavlovna, but also to himself. Of course, the spirit of utopia emanates from the pages of the novel. Chernyshevsky has to explain to the reader how Lopukhov’s “reasonable egoism” did not suffer from the decision he made. The writer clearly overestimates the role of the mind in all human actions and actions. Lopukhov’s reasoning smacks of rationalism and rationality; the introspection he carries out gives the reader a feeling of some thoughtfulness, implausibility of a person’s behavior in the situation in which Lopukhov found himself. Finally, one cannot help but notice that Chernyshevsky makes the decision easier by the fact that Lopukhov and Vera Pavlovna do not yet have a real family, no child. Many years later, in the novel Anna Karenina, Tolstoy will rebut Chernyshevsky about the tragic fate of the main character, and in War and Peace he will challenge the excessive enthusiasm of revolutionary democrats for the ideas of women's emancipation. N” one way or another, and in the theory of “reasonable egoism” of Chernyshevsky’s heroes there is an undeniable appeal and an obvious rational grain, especially important for the Russian people, who for centuries lived under the strong pressure of autocratic statehood, which restrained initiative and sometimes extinguished the creative impulses of the human personality. The morality of Chernyshevsky’s heroes, in a certain sense, has not lost its relevance in our times, when society’s efforts are aimed at awakening a person from moral apathy and lack of initiative, at overcoming dead formalism.
“New people in “What is to be done?””
What distinguishes “new people” from “vulgar” ones, such as Marya Aleksevna? A new understanding of human “benefit”, natural, unperverted, corresponding to human nature. For Marya Aleksevna, it is beneficial that she satisfies her narrow, “unreasonable” petty-bourgeois egoism. New people see their “benefit” in something else: in the social significance of their work, in the pleasure of doing good to others, in bringing benefit to others - in “reasonable egoism.” The morality of the new people is revolutionary in its deep, inner essence; it completely denies and destroys the officially recognized morality, on the foundations of which Chernyshevsky’s contemporary society rests - the morality of sacrifice and duty. Lopukhov says that “the victim is soft-boiled boots.” All actions, all deeds of a person are only truly viable when they are performed not under compulsion, but according to internal attraction, when they are consistent with desires and beliefs. Everything that is done in society under duress, under the pressure of duty, ultimately turns out to be inferior and stillborn. Such, for example, is the noble reform “from above” - the “sacrifice” brought by the upper class to the people. The morality of new people frees up the creative possibilities of the human personality, joyfully realizing the true needs of human nature, based, according to Chernyshevsky, on the “instinct of social solidarity.” In accordance with this instinct, Lopukhov enjoys doing science, and Vera Pavlovna enjoys working with people and running sewing workshops on reasonable and fair socialist principles. New people are solving love problems and problems of family relationships that are fatal to humanity in a new way. Chernyshevsky is convinced that the main source of intimate dramas is inequality between men and women, a woman’s dependence on a man. Emancipation, Chernyshevsky hopes, will significantly change the very nature of love. A woman’s excessive concentration on love feelings will disappear. Her participation on an equal basis with a man in public affairs will remove drama in love relationships, and at the same time destroy the feeling of jealousy as purely selfish in nature. New people resolve the most dramatic conflict in human relationships, the love triangle, differently, less painfully. Pushkin’s “how God grant your beloved one to be different” becomes for them not an exception, but an everyday norm of life. Lopukhov, having learned about Vera Pavlovna’s love for Kirsanov, voluntarily gives way to his friend, leaving the stage. Moreover, on Lopukhov’s part this is not a sacrifice - but “the most profitable benefit.” Ultimately, having made a “calculation of benefits,” he experiences a joyful feeling of satisfaction from an act that brings happiness not only to Kirsanov and Vera Pavlovna, but also to himself. Of course, the spirit of utopia emanates from the pages of the novel. Chernyshevsky has to explain to the reader how Lopukhov’s “reasonable egoism” did not suffer from the decision he made. The writer clearly overestimates the role of the mind in all human actions and actions. Lopukhov’s reasoning smacks of rationalism and rationality; the introspection he carries out gives the reader a feeling of some thoughtfulness, implausibility of a person’s behavior in the situation in which Lopukhov found himself. Finally, one cannot help but notice that Chernyshevsky makes the decision easier by the fact that Lopukhov and Vera Pavlovna do not yet have a real family, no child. Many years later, in the novel Anna Karenina, Tolstoy will rebut Chernyshevsky about the tragic fate of the main character, and in War and Peace he will challenge the excessive enthusiasm of revolutionary democrats for the ideas of women's emancipation. N” one way or another, and in the theory of “reasonable egoism” of Chernyshevsky’s heroes there is an undeniable appeal and an obvious rational grain, especially important for the Russian people, who for centuries lived under the strong pressure of autocratic statehood, which restrained initiative and sometimes extinguished the creative impulses of the human personality. The morality of Chernyshevsky’s heroes, in a certain sense, has not lost its relevance in our times, when society’s efforts are aimed at awakening a person from moral apathy and lack of initiative, at overcoming dead formalism.
Other works on this work
“Humanity cannot live without generous ideas.” F. M. Dostoevsky. (Based on one of the works of Russian literature. - N.G. Chernyshevsky. “What to do?”.) “The greatest truths are the simplest” by L.N. Tolstoy (Based on one of the works of Russian literature - N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” ?) “New people” in the novel by G. N. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” New people" in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky "What to do? “New People” by Chernyshevsky A special person Rakhmetov “Reasonable egoists” by N. G. Chernyshevsky The future is bright and wonderful (based on the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What is to be done?”) Genre and ideological originality of N. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” As N. G. Chernyshevsky answers the question posed in the title of the novel “What to do?” My opinion about the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” New people (based on the novel “What is to be done?”) New people in “What is to be done?” The image of Rakhmetov The image of Rakhmetov in the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” From Rakhmetov to Pavel Vlasov The problem of love in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” The problem of happiness in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” Rakhmetov is a “special” hero of N. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” Rakhmetov among the heroes of Russian literature of the 19th century Rakhmetov and the path to a bright future (N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done”) Rakhmetov as a “special person” in N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” The role of Vera Pavlovna’s dreams in revealing the author’s plan N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done” about human relationships Vera Pavlovna’s dreams (based on N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?”) The theme of labor in N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” ? The theory of “reasonable egoism” in the novel by G. N. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” Philosophical views in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What is to be done?” The artistic originality of the novel “What is to be done?” Artistic features and compositional originality of N. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” Features of utopia in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” What does it mean to be a “special” person? (Based on the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What is to be done?”) The era of the reign of Alexander II and the emergence of “new people” described in the novel by N. Chernyshevsky “What is to be done?” The author's answer to the question in the title The system of images in the novel “What is to be done?” The novel “What is to be done?” Analysis of the evolution of literary heroes using the example of the image of Rakhmetov Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” The composition of Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” The main theme of the novel “What to do?” The creative history of the novel “What to do?” Vera Pavlovna and the Frenchwoman Julie in the novel “What is to be done?” The genre and ideological originality of N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” A new attitude towards women in the novel “What is to be done?” Roman "What to do?" Evolution of the idea. The problem of the genre Characteristics of the image of Alexey Petrovich Mertsalov About human relationships What answers does the novel “What to do?” "Real dirt." What does Chernyshevsky mean by using this term Chernyshevsky Nikolai Gavrilovich, prose writer, philosopher Features of utopia in Nikolai Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” THE IMAGE OF RAKHMETOV IN N.G.’S NOVEL CHERNYSHEVSKY “WHAT TO DO?” How are the moral ideals of “new people” close to me (based on Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?”) Rakhmetov “a special person”, “a superior nature”, a person of “a different breed” Nikolai Gavrilovich Chernyshevsky Rakhmetov and new people in the novel “What is to be done?” What attracts me to the character of Rakhmetov? The hero of the novel “What is to be done?” Rakhmetov Realistic novel in N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” Kirsanov and Vera Pavlovna in the novel “What to do?” Characteristics of the image of Marya Alekseevna in the novel “What to do?” Russian utopian socialism in Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” The plot structure of the novel “What is to be done?” Chernyshevsky N. G. “What to do?” Is there truth in Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” Reflection of the author’s humanistic idea in the characters of the novel “What is to be done?” Love in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” My remarks about the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do” Rakhmetov is a “special” hero of the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” Guide to action
"New people!" in the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?”
N. G. Chernyshevsky wrote his novel “What is to be done?” while imprisoned in the Peter and Paul Fortress. In this novel, he wrote about “new people” who had just appeared in the country.
In the novel “What is to be done?”, in its entire figurative system, Chernyshevsky tried to present in living heroes, in life situations, those standards that, as he believed, should be the main measure of public morality. In their statement, Chernyshevsky saw the high purpose of art.
Heroes "What to do?" - “special people”, “new people”: Lopukhov, Kirsanov, Vera Pavlovna. Their so-called rational egoism is the result of a conscious sense of purpose, the conviction that an individual can only feel good in a rationally structured society, among people who also feel good. These rules, as we know, were adhered to by Chernyshevsky himself in life; they are followed by the “new people” - the heroes of his novel.
“New people” do not sin and do not repent. They always think and therefore only make errors in calculations, and then correct these errors and avoid them in subsequent calculations. Among the “new people”, goodness and truth, honesty and knowledge, character and intelligence turn out to be identical concepts; The smarter a person is, the more honest he is, because he makes fewer mistakes. “New people” never demand anything from others; they themselves need complete freedom of feelings, thoughts and actions, and therefore they deeply respect this freedom in others. They accept from each other what is given - I do not say voluntarily, this is not enough, but with joy, with complete and living pleasure.
Lopukhov, Kirsanov and Vera Pavlovna, who appear in the novel “What to do?” the main representatives of the new type of people, do not do anything that would exceed ordinary human capabilities. They are ordinary people, and the author himself recognizes them as such people; This circumstance is extremely important, and it gives the entire novel a particularly deep meaning. Describing Lopukhov, Kirsanov and Vera Pavlovna, the author states: this is how ordinary people can be, and this is how they should be if they want to find a lot of happiness and pleasure in life. Wishing
To prove to readers that they are truly ordinary people, the author brings onto the stage the titanic figure of Rakhmetov, whom he himself recognizes as extraordinary and calls him “special.” Rakhmetov does not participate in the action of the novel, and he has nothing to do in it. People like him are necessary only then and there, when and where they can be historical figures. Neither science nor family happiness satisfies them. They love all people, suffer from every injustice that occurs, experience in their own souls the great grief of millions and give everything they can give to heal this grief. Chernyshevsky’s attempt to introduce a special person to readers can be called successful. Before him, Turgenev took on this matter, but completely unsuccessfully.
Chernyshevsky’s “new people” are the children of city officials and townspeople. They work, study natural sciences, and began to make their way in life early. Therefore, they understand working people and take the path of transforming their lives. They are engaged in work that is necessary for the people, abandoning all the benefits that private practice could give them. Before us is a whole group of like-minded people. The basis of their activity is propaganda. Kirsanov’s student circle is one of the most effective. Young revolutionaries are educated here, the personality of a “special person”, a professional revolutionary, is formed here.
Chernyshevsky also touches on the problem of women's emancipation. Having escaped from her parents' house, Vera Pavlovna frees other women. She creates a workshop where she helps poor girls find their place in life. Chernyshevsky thus wants to show what needs to be transferred from the future to the present. These include new labor relations, fair wages, and the combination of mental and physical work.
Thus, Russian literature, like a mirror, reflected the emergence of “new people”, new trends in the development of society. At the same time, literary heroes became models for worship and imitation. And the social literary utopia “What to do?” in the part that talks about the fair organization of labor and remuneration for labor, it became a guiding star for several generations of Russian revolutionaries.
Essay on the topic of new people in Chernyshevsky’s novel, what to do
CLASSICS N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY “NEW PEOPLE” IN N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY’S NOVEL “WHAT TO DO?” Kind and strong, honest and skillful, you recently began to appear among us, but there are already many of you and the number is quickly growing. N. G. Chernyshevsky “New People”, which Chernyshevsky wrote about in his novel, were representatives of a new phase in the development of society of that time. The world of these people was formed in the struggle against the old regime, which had outlived its usefulness, but continued to dominate. The heroes of the novel at almost every step encountered difficulties and adversities of the old order and overcame them. The “new people” in the work are commoners. They were determined, had a goal in life, knew what they should do, and were united by common ideas and aspirations. “Their main desire is for the people to be free, happy, and live in contentment.” The “new people” believed in their people, saw them as decisive, powerful, and capable of fighting. But in order for him to achieve his goal, he must be taught, inspired and united. The commoners, who are the heroes of Chernyshevsky’s novel, have a developed sense of self-esteem, pride, and the ability to stand up for themselves. The author writes: “Each of them is a courageous person, who does not hesitate, who does not yield, who knows how to take up a task, and if he takes it up, he grasps it tightly, so that it does not slip out of his hands. This is one side of their properties; on the other hand, each of them is a person of impeccable honesty, such that the question does not even occur to you, can you rely on this person in everything, unconditionally? This is as clear as the fact that he is breathing through his chest; as long as this chest breathes, it is hot and unchanging, feel free to lay your head on it...” Chernyshevsky was able to show their common, typical features, but also the characteristics of each of them. Lopukhov and Kirsanov always relied only on themselves, worked together in the name of a high goal - to develop and improve science, selfless, helping those who need help, who deserve it. They did not seek profit in treating the sick. But Dmitry Sergeevich is calmer, Alexander Matveevich is an emotional and artistic person. It was difficult for Vera Pavlovna to live in her own home due to the constant oppression and reproaches of her mother, but she did not break under the oppression, did not surrender to the mercy of the old order. This Heroine was strong by nature, from an early age she had her own views on life, she always wanted freedom and a life without lies. It was not her habit to be disingenuous in front of people and, most importantly, in front of herself. She could not build her happiness on the misfortune of others, and did not tolerate being treated like a thing. Vera Pavlovna tried to understand the rational structure of society, so she created a sewing workshop with fair procedures and conditions. She is not interested in money, she wants to see the process itself. By doing good for oneself, one does good for others. Vera Pavlovna, creating a workshop, sets out to educate “new people.” She believes that there are many good people, but they need to be helped, and they will help others, and there will be more “new people.” Vera Pavlovna is a different character than Katerina Polozova. Rakhmetov is a special person, of all the others he is the most active. He understands that the struggle for a new world will be life and death. By all possible means he prepares himself for it. This hero is “the salt of the earth, the engine of engines.” He renounced his personal interests for the sake of one goal.' Has enormous energy, endurance, clarity of thoughts and behavior. As Chernyshevsky writes: “Rakhmetov is an ebullient person, he was a master of business, he was a great psychologist.” “And Lopukhov, and Kirsanov, and Vera Pavlovna, and Polozova, and Rakhmetov are people of strong passions, great experiences, and rich temperament. But at the same time, they can control their feelings, subordinate their behavior to the great tasks of the common cause.” “New people” are people of high ideals. Activity for them was the implementation of these ideals. All “new people” lived according to the “theory of rational egoism.” By doing things for themselves and in their own name, they also benefit others. According to Chernyshevsky, “new people” behave the same in all situations: they remain human under any circumstances. “New people” are not two-faced. The heroes of Chernyshevsky’s novel respect their loved one, do everything to make his life better, and treat each other as equals. That is why their love is pure and noble. (No Ratings Yet) Loading…
Similar essays:
PUBLICITY IN N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY’S NOVEL “WHAT TO DO?” Chernyshevsky, imprisoned in the Peter and Paul Fortress, a victim of tsarist tyranny, did not lose heart. In the fortress he conceived and wrote a number of books, including the famous novel “What is to be done?”, which... Good and Strong (Based on the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky What is to be done?) “Kind and Strong” (Based on the novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?”) I. The meaning of the subtitle of the novel – “From stories about new people.” II. “A person can be kind and happy...” is the leitmotif of the novel... "What to do?" - a novel about “new” people Novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” written in 1863. It became a reference book for young people of that time. More than one subsequent generation was brought up on it. What to do? How to live further?... SOCIALIST UTOPISM OF N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY Russian socialist utopianism goes back to French Christian socialism, whose representatives were Charles Fourier and Claude Henri Saint-Simon. Their goal was to create general well-being, and to carry out the reform in such a way... PICTURE OF “NEW PEOPLE” IN THE WORKS OF I. S. TURGENEV AND N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY Almost all major Russian writers were worried about the fate of the leading man of their time, This topic found its reflection in Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons” and in Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” The main characters... THE PLACE AND ROLE OF N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY IN THE SOCIAL MOVEMENT In the era when Chernyshevsky lived and worked, the character and type of the Russian intelligentsia changed, because its social composition changed. If in the 40s it consisted mainly of nobles, then in... Skaftymov A.P. CHERNYSHEVSKY’S WORKS OF FICTION, WRITTEN IN THE PETROPAUL FORTRESS CHERNYSHEVSKY’S FICTION WORKS, WRITTEN IN THE PETROPAUL FORTRESS Novel “What to do?” is remarkable for its truthful reproduction of the social conflict between people of the old, moribund world and new people, from democratic circles, supporters of the new materialistic and... Composition based on the painting by Bogdanov-Belsky New Masters Bogdanov-Belsky chose an interesting topic, which he revealed to the viewer in his canvas “New Masters”. Here is a picture of a family sitting and drinking tea at the table. An ordinary picture, but there is something to think about... New sufferings of young V. GERMAN LITERATURE Ulrich Plenzdorf New sufferings of young V. (Die neuen Leiden des jungen W.) Tale (1972) The story begins with several obituary notices of death from the electric discharge of seventeen-year-old Edgar Wibo... New records of Qi Xie, or What Confucius did not say CHINESE LITERATURE Author of retellings I. S. Smirnov Yuan Mei New records of Qi Xie, or What Confucius did not say Novellas (XVIII century) PALACE AT THE END OF THE EARTH Lee Chang-ming, military official ,... NIKOLAI GAVRILOVICH CHERNYSHEVSKY NIKOLAI GAVRILOVICH CHERNYSHEVSKY (1828-1889) An outstanding Russian publicist, literary critic, writer, one of the founders of the populist movement in Russia. He worked for the progressive-democratic magazine Sovremennik, and was one of its leaders. In the field of literature... Hurry to do good What do you think is good? What is evil? Throughout its history, humanity has been trying to answer these eternal questions. Let's judge together. It seems to me that goodness comes first... Is it difficult or easy to do goodness? (parable of the Good Samaritan) Plan I. Theme of good and evil. II. Parable of the Good Samaritan: 1. The case of the Jew. 2. Moral choice of passers-by: A) the convictions of the priest; B) the indifference of the Levite; C) help from a Samaritan. 3. Indifference... “PEOPLE OF SLAVE CALL” IN N. A. NEKRASOV’S POEM “WHO LIVES WELL IN Rus'” (option 1) The poem “Who lives well in Rus'” is the pinnacle of Nekrasov’s creativity. This work is grandiose in its breadth of concept, truthfulness, brightness and variety of types. The plot of the poem is close to the folk tale about the search for happiness... What do I like to do and why? What do I like to do and why? I love helping my mom. This is, of course, out of date. My girlfriends love to dance and talk on the phone. And I like to manage the kitchen with my mother... THE ABILITY TO MAKE GIFTS Making gifts correctly is a real art. There is even such a word in the Russian language - “donator”. It denoted a person who gives something as a gift without asking for anything in return. For example, we can... COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF ONEGIN AND PECHORIN (advanced people of the 19th century, option 1) I look sadly at our generation! Its future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge and doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M. Yu. Lermontov “Eugene Onegin” by Pushkin... HURRY TO DO GOOD DEEDS A. YASHIN HURRY TO DO GOOD DEEDS My life with my stepfather was not fun, Still, he raised me - And that’s why Sometimes I regret that I didn’t have the chance to please him with at least something . When... Analysis of Mandelstam's poem “A body has been given to me - what should I do with it?” Questions of the universe have interested Osip Mandelstam since childhood. He was interested in various types of exact sciences, but very soon became disillusioned with natural science, since he was unable to get answers to the questions that interested him... “A real writer is the same as an ancient prophet: he sees more clearly than ordinary people” (A.P. Chekhov). Reading your favorite lines of Russian poetry. (Based on the works of N. A. Nekrasov) Russian literature of the 2nd half of the 19th century “A real writer is the same as an ancient prophet: he sees more clearly than ordinary people” (A. P. Chekhov). Reading your favorite lines of Russian poetry. (According to works... Characteristics of the image of Platon Karataev in the novel “War and Peace” The author calls Platon Karataev in the novel the personification of everything Russian, good and round. This peasant, cut off from his usual environment, is an example of a “natural” person, the embodiment of folk morality. He lives in harmony... Female images in L. N. Tolstoy’s novel “War and Peace” The female theme occupies an important place in L. N. Tolstoy’s epic novel “War and Peace" (1863-1869). This is the writer’s answer to supporters of women’s emancipation.At one of the poles of artistic research there are numerous types... PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS IN L. N. TOLSTOY’S NOVEL “WAR AND PEACE” L. N. Tolstoy’s philosophical and historical epic novel “War and Peace” also has the features of a psychological novel. Page after page, the characters of Tolstoy’s heroes are revealed to the reader in their similarity and diversity, staticity and... “Family Thought” in L.N. Tolstoy’s novel “War and Peace” Tolstoy considered the family to be the basis of everything. It contains love, and the future, and peace, and goodness. Families make up society, the moral laws of which are laid down and preserved in the family. The writer’s family... FEMALE IMAGES IN M. YU. LERMONTOV’S NOVEL “A HERO OF OUR TIME” (option 1) There is nothing in the world more beautiful than a woman... F. I. Tyutchev The basis of the writer’s creativity is inspiration sent from above. And this inspiration is feminine. It is no coincidence that the muse is a woman, To women’s feet... Biblical images in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “Crime and Punishment”) Russian literature of the 2nd half of the 19th century Biblical images in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “Crime and Punishment” The influence of Christianity can be can be traced in the works of many Russian writers, since faith in the triune... Russia in I. A. Goncharov’s novel “An Ordinary Story” I. A. Goncharov is a writer who, like no one else, understood and accepted the changes that happened to Russia when in its measured Western trends began to seep into the patriarchal structure. He traveled a lot,... V. G. Belinsky about the novel “Hero of Our Time” HERO OF OUR TIME V. G. Belinsky about the novel “Hero of Our Time” 1. About the composition “Gradual penetration into the inner world of the hero. “Bela”, containing the interest of a separate and complete story, in... Landscape in L. N. Tolstoy’s novel “Anna Karenina” The chanting of the mighty Forces of nature is one of the characteristic features of Tolstoy’s work. Tolstoy briefly depicts the world of dead things, but very colorfully and in detail he describes the natural world surrounding his heroes. Deep penetration... The image of Evgeny Bazarov in the novel “Fathers and Sons” The main character of I. S. Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons” Evgeny Bazarov is one of the controversial, but most liked by readers, heroes. Many called him a man of the modern generation, a reformer. So why... “NEW PEOPLE” IN N. G. CHERNYSHEVSKY’S NOVEL “WHAT TO DO?”