This article describes the image of Oblomov, Zakhar, women in the form of an essay for grade 10.
Oblomov’s image lies in the fact that this is an adult who is completely unadapted to life. And although the hero himself believes that he lives correctly, from the point of view of a normal person he is unhappy. In addition, he drove himself into this cocoon, in which he stays day and night. Therefore, his image was described by writers of different times and ridiculed by critics.
Nowadays, in the image of this character, children write essays in schools and learn from his example how not to act and live. Below you will find several essays on the topic of Oblomov . Read on.
Creating the image of Oblomov in the education system: main points, brief image
Researchers believe that the image of Oblomov was created based on the story “Dashing Illness ,” which described an epidemic of human melancholy and apathy. Those who fell ill with it began to build empty castles in the air and indulge themselves with illusions. This is very similar to the lifestyle of Ilya Ilyich . This is how the image of Oblomov is created in the education system - the main points, a brief image :
At first, only part of the work was published, namely “Oblomov’s Dream” . Goncharov wrote his manuscript Simbirsk . However, then the creation was repeatedly refined.
For a long time, the public was tormented by the question: who did Goncharov his hero on? In fact, it's simple. He wrote it off as himself. The writer and the hero have many common features - Goncharov has admitted more than once that he is quite lazy and slow (by the way, his friends also noticed this). But at the same time, he was not without a sharp mind and dreaminess.
Both Goncharov and Oblomov come from the outback, but are far from being of an ordinary class. In the education system, the hero is interpreted as a symbol of incredible laziness, possessing a whole set of negative qualities. However, for some reason of Ilya Ilyich Yes, it is noticeable to the reader that the hero is mistaken, he has developed an incorrect value system by which he lives, but there is no negativity towards this hero.
In the school curriculum, Oblomov plays an educational role. Despite the fact that few people think about the class of landowners, from the example of the main character one can understand that a person should not drag out a useless existence. Otherwise, he will not be able to achieve anything in life. A person, on the contrary, must be lively and active, be able to achieve goals, take risks and not give in to difficulties.
“Oblomov” by I. A. Goncharov - images of heroes: Ilya Oblomov and Stolz, briefly
Images of heroes: Ilya Oblomov and Stolz
Despite the fact that Oblomov and Stolz are friends, they are completely different. Moreover, both externally and in worldview. Here are briefly the images of these heroes - Ilya Oblomov and Stolz from the work “Oblomov” by I. A. Goncharov :
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is from a wealthy family. By the way, his lifestyle comes from childhood. The Oblomovs have long valued only delicious food and sweet sleep. They had no more interests in life. They raised the boy to be pampered and incapable of even looking after himself. They didn’t persuade him to go to school - on the contrary, they were happy when the opportunity arose to leave him at home, in the warmth.
This is the kind of man he grew up to be. Ilya Ilyich is not stupid, but lazy and childish. He rarely leaves the couch (let alone the house), is afraid to change his life, and is indecisive. Ilya is not used to achieving goals. Previously, his parents did everything for him, but now it’s Zakhar.
Stolz is a young man who has never suffered from an abundance of care and love. He had to make his own way in life. His mother taught him to read and write and developed him spiritually. And my German father taught me discipline and order.
And if Oblomov is an apathetic person, unadapted to life, then Stolz is a person in whose hands everything is literally “burning.” He knows how to negotiate with people, knows how to solve this or that everyday issue, and is not afraid of temporary difficulties. He got used to working from an early age.
Stolz is an active person with a strong character. In the work, he looks much more advantageous than the loose and clumsy Ilya Ilyich. The hero always tries to do something, he does not sit still. He tries to change his friend too, but the case is too advanced.
What they have in common is that both Oblomov and Stolz do not know limits. The first one is afraid to move and live, and the second one cannot stop.
Oblomov's essay: his essence, character and fate.
I. A. Goncharov wrote relatively few works, and “Oblomov” is one of the brightest. The novel touches on almost all aspects of human life, and answers to many questions can be found in it. Without a doubt, the most interesting image of the novel is that of the main character. Who is he? “Master,” says Zakhar without a drop of doubt. Master? Yes. But which one? From the very first pages we see a portrait of Ilya Ilyich, drawn by the author. The first impression cannot be called repulsive, it is rather surprising, especially the words that “lying with Ilya Ilyich ... was a normal state,” and this is for a man “about thirty-two or three years old,” in the prime of his life! Compared to the energetic and active Stolz, Tarantiev, Volkov, he looks at least strange. But this is only at first, superficial glance. As we approach the end of the novel, Oblomov gradually rises in our eyes from his sofa to the heights of Olympus. He appears as a completely different person, much more elevated than at the very beginning. So who is he really? How does he live? For many years now, Ilya Ilyich has been living in a dirty apartment on Gorokhovaya Street - he lives. For many years he has been walking around in a comfortable robe and wide shoes - he lives. For many years he has been seeing light through dirty glass - he lives! So, all this - spacious clothes, a sofa, dust - is his ideal? Outwardly yes. But, in my opinion, what is much more important is the person as a person, the person “from the inside.” And he himself admits this: “Give me a man, a man!” He loves people, but not all those who move in high society. From the point of view of the lying philosopher, are these people? Is this life? “Either I don’t understand this life, or it’s no good,” he says. If we add to all this the gentleness that distinguishes Ilya Ilyich, then the ideal of the moral world of man appears before us. People with such convictions need to manage states, implement reforms, and not lie on sofas. But Oblomov acted in exactly the opposite way, because he does not have the strength to realize what he thinks and dreams about. But the worst thing, in my opinion, is that Ilya Ilyich himself is aware of his tragedy. There is nothing worse and heavier than the consciousness of one’s own powerlessness. Considering all that has been said, Oblomov for me is not just some kind of example of laziness. He is a hundred times better than all the Sudbinsky and Volkovskys combined. But, in my opinion, such a soul should under no circumstances be hidden under house arrest, thereby extinguishing it. Such a soul must be opened up, taken beyond its own boundaries, so that it glows and sparkles, bringing benefit and joy to everyone around. Somewhere and sometime in his life, Oblomov was erased from this path. Maybe when he was overprotected in childhood, maybe when he became faint-hearted in the service. But the position that the main character occupies in the novel is, in any case, better than the position of representatives of the world. Observing through stories the supposedly diverse existence and activities of other people, Oblomov asks the question: “When to live?” And he lives, but lives in his own way: thinking, but doing nothing. This, in my opinion, is the essence of what Stolz called Oblomovism: a person thinks, reflects, builds the greatest humanistic plans, but as soon as it comes to implementation, he is overcome by elementary laziness, and he remains passive. Ilya Ilyich lives exactly this way, and he is happy in his own way. Of course, it seems strange that a person who has received an excellent education cannot connect two sentences in a letter. But the reason lies in the same apathy inherent in Oblomov since childhood. Still would! For a person who considers putting on stockings on his own a feat, writing a letter is the height of courage! If we remember that for Ilya Ilyich, life and science always went separately, and work and boredom were synonymous, then it becomes clear how he ended up on his sofa, in his robe. But still there is something in Oblomov that makes the same Stolz go to him after noisy receptions. And this cannot be called only a connection with childhood memories. Andrey is attracted to Ilya, first of all, in my opinion, by his soul - pure, open, sparkling. A soul that, besides Stolz, only Zakhar and much more Olga knew about. Oblomov generally differs from the entire high society (to which he, no doubt, belongs) in his view of it. He looks from the outside, carefully analyzing all the incidents. He is able to draw such deep conclusions that Stolz involuntarily exclaims: “You are a philosopher, Ilya!” In this context, Oblomov does not look like a missing person at all. What does Ilya Ilyich need? Yes, he wants peace and slowness to reign throughout the world, as has long ago happened in himself. And everything that happens around him is “not life, but a distortion of the norm, the ideal of life, which nature indicated as the goal for man.” Oblomovism was an ulcer for Ilya Ilyich, an ulcer so strong that even love could not destroy it. No matter how it seemed that the main character had changed, loving Olga, he returned to where he came from - to his sofa. Having felt all the tension of such an unusual life for him, faced with the hypocrisy of secular people, Ilya Ilyich could no longer hope for anything other than a return “to the roots.” In his opinion, it is better to lie on his side all his life, preparing new and new plans, than to run around, fuss, and engage in empty chatter. So, through 06-Omov the couch potato, Oblomov the philosopher is also visible. This circumstance certainly raises him in our eyes. Indeed, in those days, it was very difficult for a person who in all respects belonged to high society to maintain purity and not succumb to general influence. Reading the novel by I. A. Goncharov aroused in me a variety of feelings regarding the main character. I am happy to see Oblomov’s bright, sparkling soul, his humanism, gentleness, and faith in man. But I condemn and cannot accept his apathy and laziness, which do not give wide use to a morally strong nature, which is the nature of Ilya Ilyich. Apparently, Oblomov’s whole fate is to think, think and do nothing. In conclusion, I would like to say that Oblomov’s character and essence can be considered deeply national. For many centuries now, we have been thinking, thinking, looking around: “How is it going there?”, but we are doing little. We can only hope that we will avoid the fate of Oblomov, this lazy Russian philosopher, and, although with a pure soul, will not die somewhere on the outskirts, among chicken coops and cabbage.
The image of Zakhar in Goncharov’s “Oblomov”: description
The image of Zakhar in Goncharov’s “Oblomov”
Zakhar Oblomov ’s housekeeper . His image is clearly visible in the work. Here is a description of the image of Zakhar in Goncharov’s “Oblomov”:
Zakhar is a man with sideburns and a receding hairline. He is at least 50 years old . Just like his owner, he is lazy - and does something only when it is required of him. Despite the fact that he was assigned to Oblomov from an early age, he carries out orders extremely reluctantly. It's like he's doing the owner a favor.
Just like Ilya Ilyich, he finds excuses for his inaction. Zakhar is quite sloppy. Even when in the city, he wears dirty, old-fashioned clothes. However, he also has advantages - he is incredibly devoted to Oblomov . Although she loves him in some special, not always understandable manner.
Zakhar’s main purpose is to make the main character’s life comfortable. But just like Mama once did, he shows hypertrophied care. Let's say the master is able to dress himself, but the servant still helps him. Despite the fact that Zakhar is only a servant, sometimes he can grumble at the master - and the latter will not be particularly cruel to him. It is quite possible that this happens because they have been together for a long time. The servant is grumpy and lazy. He often “pawns his collar” and is not particularly worried about the future.
The tragedy of the image lies in the fact that if Oblomov could change his life (if he wanted), then Zakhar is a forced person, he has no right to do so. We can say that Oblomov’s is a reference to Oblomovka, which has not yet been completely forgotten. The hero also exudes apathy and seems to yearn for a past life, where every day was filled with harmony and tranquility.
The image of Agafya Pshenitsyna in the novel “Oblomov” by Goncharov: essay
The image of Agafya Pshenitsyna
The image of Agafya is dual - both in the time of Goncharov and now. This is a woman of a simple class, accustomed to respecting her husband and obeying him. Its main features are sacrifice, love and humility. Here is an essay on the topic “The Image of Agafya Pshenitsyna in the novel “Oblomov” by Goncharov:
Unlike Olga , who tried to change Ilya Ilyich so that he would become the way she likes, Agafya is happy with everything - she remains tolerant of Oblomov’s . She selflessly loves him, surrounds him with care, indulges all his whims.
She does not need walks and social entertainment. Agafya believes that the main thing is home and family. aristocracy in the image of Agafya . She has worn-out hands and a simple speech. Perhaps that is why she was attracted to the man “from another world.”
On the one hand, Agafya looks like a weak-willed peasant woman. But on the other hand, she is a devoted wife who will do everything for her lover. As for Oblomov , on the one hand, he found a person who does not scold him for his shortcomings. On the other hand, the desire for spiritual growth makes Pshenitsyna shallow and gray in comparison with Ilya Ilyich.
Agafya forgives and adores everything. The hero thinks this is a way out of the situation. After all, the negative experience with Olga showed that active women who want to mold a man into the likeness of an image they themselves invented are not suitable for Ilya.
Popular writings
- Essay Love in the works of Kuprin
Love is a deep and multifaceted feeling, unselfish and selfless. Without this poetic feeling, life flies by dullly and joylessly. It was the theme of love that turned out to be the main subject of attention and depiction - Essay-description of the painting Lilac in a basket by Konchalovsky for grades 5, 7.
The world of flowers is amazing and rich. Representatives of various fields of art have devoted and continue to devote their works to this topic. - Essay “The Profession I Choose”
Many people dream of becoming successful, making money, having a luxury home, a cool car, a dacha. The rich can travel the world and easily support a family
